Smoke-Free Products Behind the Counter: Lessons from Pharmacist-Only Access in Canada and Australia

When nicotine pouches and vapes are confined to pharmacy sales, governments may intend to protect youth, but the effects can limit access, fuel illicit markets, and undermine harm reduction goals. Canada: Pharmacists Push Back on Expanding Retail Access In late July 2025, a national association of Canadian pharmacists firmly rejected proposals to expand nicotine pouch…

Why the WHO Is Failing Its Own Tobacco Treaty? A Call for Harm Reduction Clarity

As global tobacco control architecture evolves, there’s growing concern that the WHO is reading its own treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), too narrowly. Ironically, while the FCTC explicitly includes harm reduction strategies in its mandate, WHO has sometimes dismissed reduced-risk nicotine products as part of industry rhetoric to be disregarded. This contradiction…

Rethinking the Role of Nicotine: A Science-Based Perspective on Harm Reduction

Nicotine has long been viewed through a narrow lens—often equated with smoking, addiction, and disease. But new research continues to challenge this oversimplification. As the global public health community confronts the rise of reduced-risk nicotine products like pouches, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco, it is vital that we separate myth from evidence in shaping responsible policy.…

Doubling Down on Nicotine Science: Springer Expands Its Focus on Smoke-Free Products

As the science around nicotine delivery evolves, so too must the platforms that publish and shape global understanding of its impacts. Springer’s Internal and Emergency Medicine journal has responded to this challenge with a bold move: the relaunch and expansion of its curated research collection under a new title—“Health Effects of E-Cigarettes, Heated Tobacco and…

Language Matters: Why I’m Backing a Global Term for Alternatives to Smoking

By Shem Baldeosingh, Director, Global Institute for Novel Nicotine (GINN) In a global conversation about alternatives to smoking, terminology might seem secondary—but it’s not. Language shapes perception, policy, and access. For too long, inconsistent terms and acronyms have muddled understanding and hampered harm reduction progress. That’s why we’re opening the door to a wider community…